? Brief case using I-R-A-Cand
? Answer 5 Essay Questions in Syllabus. Please label your responses to the essay questions, 1, 2, 3, etc.
Assignment =Case brief: Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent(2nd Cir. 2012) 696 F.3d 206or2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18663 (obtaincopy of court’sdecision from library using LexisNexis). Brief the case using theI-R-A-Cdiscussed below and during class, and then write essay responses to the following questions: 1) Identify the court that decided the case and describe the basis ofthe court’s jurisdiction over the parties’dispute (review Chapter 2 for guidance); 2) Name the types ofbusiness organizationsunder which Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent have organized, and state the pros and cons of each of these business forms; 3) What other alternativebusiness formscould Louboutin or Yves Saint Laurent select, and explain the pros and cons of at least one of these alternative business forms; 4) Describe the type of relief Louboutin sought in the case and state whether this is a legal or equitable remedy (review Chapter 1 for guidance); and 5) Based on class discussion concerning intellectual property rights, do you think the appellate court got its decision right in this case? Why or why not?(SLOs 1, 2, 3, and 4). Your responses to the above questions should be numbered and written in paragraph format.