He continues the search and finds more contraband and things that indicate additional contraband will be found at Krook’s apartment. Officer Michaels prepares a search warrant based on this information and goes to Krook’s apartment. Since Krook is in jail, Michaels focus open the door and begins to search.
Kens’ attorney files a motion to suppress. After an evidentiary hearing the judge rules the evidence is inadmissible.
*Define the exclusionary rule.
*Discuss alternatives to the suppression of evidence by the trial court and discuss the reasons why or why not the alternatives should be used.
*Do you think the evidence of serious wrong doing was properly dismissed? Use cases to prove why or why not. Make sure you cite the cases either per APA !!!!